Jekyll Scholar: only cited
This commit is contained in:
parent
855e6c6cf7
commit
2131583e7a
1
Gemfile
1
Gemfile
@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ ruby "2.5.1"
|
||||
|
||||
gem "nokogiri"
|
||||
gem "jekyll"
|
||||
gem "jekyll-scholar", group: :jekyll_plugins
|
||||
|
@ -48,3 +48,6 @@ showToggleButton: true
|
||||
authors:
|
||||
Mahdi:
|
||||
url: https://github.com/mdibaiee/
|
||||
|
||||
scholar:
|
||||
style: apa
|
||||
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
layout: post
|
||||
title: "An Alternative Definition of Objectivity for Rigid Scientists"
|
||||
subtitle: "On Inherent Subjectivity of Some Things"
|
||||
title: "On Inherent Subjectivity of Some Things"
|
||||
subtitle: "An Alternative Definition of Objectivity for Rigid Scientists"
|
||||
date: 2021-10-30 12:57:46
|
||||
permalink: alternative-objectivity-and-inherent-subjectivity/
|
||||
categories: philosophy
|
||||
@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ author: Mahdi
|
||||
draft: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
https://postcognitivism.wordpress.com/2021/04/06/the-great-escape-can-we-transcend-our-own-conceptual-frameworks/
|
||||
<!--https://postcognitivism.wordpress.com/2021/04/06/the-great-escape-can-we-transcend-our-own-conceptual-frameworks/
|
||||
https://gatelessgateblog.wordpress.com/
|
||||
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000121000802
|
||||
Distinctions and Common Ground in Collective Epistemology
|
||||
Distinctions and Common Ground in Collective Epistemology-->
|
||||
|
||||
As a computer scientist and someone who loves [mathematics](/mathematical-induction-proving-tiling-methods) and [abstractions](/typoclassopedia-exercise-solutions), I was obsessed with the idea of rationality, that is, an _objective_ and absolute rationality.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -24,4 +24,13 @@ So I enter this course with this mindset: we can objectively analyse the world a
|
||||
|
||||
However... I found myself to be more and more interested in the philosophy side of this course than the psychology side, hell I even started to not like the psychology side anymore, but fall in love with the philosophy. This is where I found the opposite of what I had come for: an alternative definition of objectivity, and an inherent subjectivity of some things.
|
||||
|
||||
## What is Objectivity anyway?
|
||||
|
||||
This is probably the main question here. What is objectivity? I don't think dictionary definitions are particularly authoritative when it comes to philosophy discussions, but I found this dictionary definition interesting to open the topic with:
|
||||
|
||||
> the quality or character of being objective : lack of favoritism toward one side or another : freedom from bias. {% cite objectivity-merriam-webster %}
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
{% bibliography --cited %}
|
||||
|
1
_plugins/scholar.rb
Normal file
1
_plugins/scholar.rb
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
require 'jekyll/scholar'
|
6
bibliography.bib
Normal file
6
bibliography.bib
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
@misc{objectivity-merriam-webster,
|
||||
title = {Objectivity. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary.},
|
||||
author = {Merriam-Webster. (n.d.)},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
url = {https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/objectivity}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user